SEARCH
Warenkorb
Warenkorb wird geladen
Tickets kaufen

Select Tickets:

Select Day:
  • mumok Ticket
  • Regular
    0,00 €
  • Reduced – Students under 27 years of age
    0,00 €
  • Reduced – Seniors aged 65 and over or with a senior citizens pass
    0,00 €
  • Reduced - Children and young persons under 19
    0,00 €
Due to renovation work, not all exhibition levels are accessible. Detailed information on the current exhibitions and admission prices can be found here.
Öffnungszeiten

Tuesday to Sunday

10 am to 6 pm




Detail

Johns, Jasper
Two Flags
1959
© mumok
Object description Acrylic on canvas
Object category painting
Material
Gesamtobjekt: acrylic paint, canvas
Technique
Dimensions
Rahmenmaß: height: 207 cm, width: 152 cm, depth: 3,6 cm, height: 204,5 cm, width: 149,5 cm, depth: 3 cm
Objektmaß: height: 203,5 cm, width: 148,5 cm
Gewicht: weight: 37 kg
Year of acquisition 1978
Inventory number L 112/0
Creditline mumok - Museum moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig Wien, Leihgabe der Sammlung Ludwig, Aachen
Rights reference Bildrecht, Wien
Further information about the person Johns, Jasper [GND]
Literature Museum moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig Wien
Jasper Johns-Gray
Jasper Johns
Rebecca Salter into the light of things
Jasper Johns "Die Tätigkeit des Auges"
Cool and the Cold : Malerei aus dem USA und der UdSSR 1960 - 1990 Sammlung Ludwig

In 1954, in a radical gesture of liberation, Jasper Johns destroyed his entire early oeuvre in order to begin again with two simple subjects: the American flag and the target ? “Things”, said Johns, “which one already has an idea about and I did not have to invent.” Anyone casts a quick glance at "Two Flags" might well see an abstract painting for a moment. Johns causes a shift in the symbolic signifier of the Stars and Stripes, which is otherwise characterized by total visibility, into the quiet area of monochrome painting, the essentially invisible. “The picture of a flag is always about a flag; but it does not concern a flag any more than it does a brush stroke, a color or the physical characteristics of painting materials, I think.” The flat surface of the flag is copied to the canvas in freely applied brush strokes so that its form corresponds to the picture support. This underlines the object nature of the picture that should be perceived as a concrete reality. ? Are we dealing with a flag or a picture? When viewing the work one oscillates, sliding between recognition of the cliché-like picture motif and the material corporeality of the picture surface. The pastose application of paint conveys the impression of being made and destroys the familiar perfection of the model. The doubling up of the flag affects its simultaneous disappearance.